Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege cover image

Links

Amazon

Twitch

CRITIK

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Item: Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Author: Critik Editorial Team

2015

GenresAction, Shooter, Strategy, Military and Warfare, Single Player, Multiplayer, First Person Perspective

AvailableDec 1, 2015

PlatformPC, PlayStation 5, PlayStation 4, Xbox One, Xbox Series X

DeveloperUbisoft Montreal

Overview

Inspired by the reality of counter terrorist operatives across the world, Rainbow Six Siege invites players to master the art of destruction. Intense close quarters confrontations, high lethality, tactics, team play, and explosive action are at the center of the experience. The multiplayer gameplay of Rainbow Six Siege sets a new bar for intense firefights and expert strategy in the rich legacy of past Rainbow Six games.

Elsewhere

Game analysis

Critik Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive (80-100)

Mixed (50-79)

89%

Negative (0-49)

11%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The opinions of the critics regarding the story of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege are quite varied. DarkStation appreciated the opening cinematic for establishing the premise effectively, while GameCrate found depth in the story framework set by the reactivation of the Rainbow program under the orders of 'Six' to combat The White Masks. PlaySense also highlighted the focus on reestablishing the Rainbow Program to combat this new terrorist organization, which shows a positive aspect of the game's narrative setup. On the negative side, critics like Gaming Age, Slant Magazine, and The Digital Fix criticized the game for lacking a traditional campaign or story mode, which may disappoint fans of the series expecting a more narrative-driven experience. Washington Post echoed this sentiment by mentioning that the single-player 'Situations' felt hollow and lacked narrative context or characterization. Games.cz also noted the lack of a cohesive story and PvE mode, with single-player challenges being described as dull and frustrating. Overall, the consensus among the critics leans towards the game lacking a cohesive and traditional story campaign. While some reviewers appreciated the depth in the story framework and the premise established by the opening cinematic, the majority of critics expressed disappointment in the absence of a narrative arc and character development. The emphasis on multiplayer gameplay and training missions rather than a story-driven campaign seems to be a point of contention among the reviewers, with many feeling that Rainbow Six Siege falls short in delivering a satisfying single-player experience. Critics like Worth Playing and Yahoo! emphasized the absence of a persistent character or traditional story mode, further solidifying the general sentiment that the game prioritizes multiplayer combat over narrative depth.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Critics have mixed opinions on the story of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege. Some praise the premise and focus on combatting terrorism, while others criticize the lack of a traditional story mode and character development. Overall, the consensus is that the game falls short in delivering a cohesive and narrative-driven experience, prioritizing multiplayer gameplay over storytelling.

Gameplay Mechanics

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive (80-100)

89%

Mixed (50-79)

11%

Negative (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The majority of critics praised the gameplay of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege for its emphasis on tactical team-based skirmishes, unique Operators, and gadgets that promote strategic gameplay over simple shooting mechanics. PlayStation Universe commended the game for its focus on multiplayer team dynamics, while Cheat Code Central highlighted the importance of communication and teamwork for success in both PvP and PvE modes. Game Rant and GameStar also appreciated the intense and immersive gameplay experience, with GameStar specifically mentioning the solo and co-op modes as providing a good introduction to the multiplayer aspect. The destructible environments, diverse Operators, and strategic gameplay elements like breaching and destruction were lauded by Arcade Sushi, Telegraph, and Guardian, showcasing the depth and variety the game offers. On the downside, some critics pointed out certain limitations and flaws in the gameplay of Rainbow Six Siege. Multiplayer.it mentioned design flaws like dead players assisting their team and limited map rotation, which detracted from the overall experience. Everyeye.it highlighted balancing issues and erratic AI behavior in single-player and cooperative modes, leading to occasional frustrations. Metro GameCentral also noted the reliance on microtransactions and limited modes as drawbacks, suggesting room for improvement in terms of content variety and monetization strategies. These criticisms indicate that while the game excels in many aspects, there are areas that could be refined to enhance the overall gameplay experience. Overall, the consensus among critics is overwhelmingly positive regarding the gameplay of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege. The game is widely praised for its strategic depth, emphasis on teamwork and communication, diverse Operator abilities, and destructible environments that create dynamic and engaging matches. Critics like Slant Magazine may have found the gameplay to be lacking in innovation, but the majority of reviewers, such as Worth Playing and USgamer, appreciate the unique and tense gameplay experience that the title offers. With a focus on tactical decision-making, intense shootouts, and rewarding coordination, Rainbow Six Siege stands out as a thinking gamer's shooter that successfully prioritizes strategy and teamwork over traditional run-and-gun mechanics.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Critics laud Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege for its tactical team-based gameplay, diverse Operators, and strategic elements like destructible environments. Praise for multiplayer dynamics, communication importance, and intense gameplay experience. Some criticisms include design flaws, balancing issues, and reliance on microtransactions. Overall, the game excels in strategy and teamwork, though some areas could be refined. Rainbow Six Siege is celebrated for its unique, engaging, and thinking gamer's shooter experience.

Graphics and Visual Design

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive (80-100)

41%

Mixed (50-79)

55%

Negative (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The opinions of the critics regarding the Graphics and Visual Design of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege are varied, with some positive aspects highlighted. Push Square commends the game's native 4K resolution at 60 frames-per-second on the PS5, stating that the assets look shockingly good. Game Rant also praises the graphics, describing them as superb, while Gaming Age appreciates the level of detail put into both the environments and weapons. Additionally, Metro GameCentral and PlaySense highlight the fantastic destruction effects and impressive visuals with realistic details, respectively. On the other hand, several critics point out the negatives in the game's graphics and visual design. Atomix and Multiplayer.it express disappointment with the mediocre graphics and lackluster visuals, citing simplistic models and basic textures as drawbacks. IGN mentions that the game is not the best-looking shooter in terms of environmental detail or character models, although it includes memorable touches like arterial blood spray. Furthermore, Vandal notes that the graphics may not be visually stunning compared to current standards, with some dated textures and level designs impacting the overall experience. Overall, the consensus among the critics leans towards a mixed reception of the Graphics and Visual Design of Rainbow Six Siege. While some critics appreciate the detailed environments, impressive destruction effects, and attention to realism, others criticize the game for its dated graphics, lackluster textures, and occasional technical issues. The Digital Fix notes that while the graphics are good with a high level of destructibility, the uninspired and bland maps detract from the overall visual experience. Despite the varying opinions on the game's visuals, it is evident that Rainbow Six Siege manages to offer a visually appealing experience for players, albeit with some room for improvement in certain areas, as highlighted by critics like Everyeye.it and Forbes.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Critics are divided on the graphics of Rainbow Six Siege. Some praise its stunning 4K visuals and detailed environments, while others criticize its dated textures and lackluster design. Overall, opinions vary on the game's visual appeal, with some highlighting its strengths in realism and destruction effects, while others point out areas for improvement like uninspired maps and technical issues.

Music and Sound Design

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive (80-100)

74%

Mixed (50-79)

26%

Negative (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The opinions of multiple critics regarding the sound design and music of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege overwhelmingly praise the game for its exceptional sound design and immersive audio experience. Critics such as Arcade Sushi, PlaySense, and Vandal highlight the excellent sound effects that enhance gameplay by providing detailed audio cues for player positioning and actions, creating an intense and immersive gaming experience. IGN and VideoGamer also commend the game for utilizing sound as a tactical element, allowing players to hear opponents moving around and providing valuable information before engaging in combat. On the negative side, a few critics mention issues with the sound design impacting the overall experience. GameOver.gr notes that the sound design lacks realism at times, while Game Revolution mentions audio cutting out as a bug. AusGamers points out voice-activated VOIP issues and bugs that detract from the game's communication aspect, potentially hindering the gameplay experience for some players. Overall, the consensus among critics is overwhelmingly positive regarding the sound design and music of Rainbow Six Siege. The game is lauded for its immersive ambiance, realistic audio cues, and the crucial role sound plays in creating tension and enhancing the strategic depth of gameplay. Critics like Guardian, IGN, and PCWorld emphasize how the sound design provides crucial audio cues for players, adding to the immersive experience and creating a palpable atmosphere during matches. The minimalistic approach to music, as noted by Push Square and Softpedia, allows players to rely on their hearing for early detection and strategic advantage, further contributing to the game's intense and tactical gameplay. Despite some minor issues mentioned by a few critics, the overall sentiment is that the sound design and music of Rainbow Six Siege significantly contribute to its success as a tactical multiplayer experience.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Critics rave about Rainbow Six Siege's exceptional sound design, immersive audio experience, and tactical use of sound cues for intense gameplay. While some mention issues like lack of realism and audio bugs, the overall consensus is overwhelmingly positive for the game's crucial role of sound in creating tension and enhancing strategic depth. The minimalistic music approach adds to the immersive ambiance, making it a standout tactical multiplayer experience.

Voice Acting

Analysis Unavailable

Summary unavailable

TL;DR

voice acting

Description unavailable

Technical Performance

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive (80-100)

14%

Mixed (50-79)

64%

Negative (0-49)

22%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

In terms of the technical performance on different gaming platforms, Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege received mixed reviews from critics. On the PS5, Push Square praised the stability of the game and highlighted the optimal experience for new players. This positive sentiment was echoed by Game Rant, Gaming Age, and The Digital Fix, who all mentioned the reliable servers and lack of major technical issues on the PS4 version. Additionally, Atomix appreciated aspects like sound mixing on the PS4. However, the PS4 version of the game faced several technical challenges according to critics. Kill Screen and Multiplayer.it criticized the network support, with Kill Screen noting troublingly unreliable connections and Multiplayer.it mentioning technical issues impacting the overall experience. PlaySense and The Jimquisition highlighted graphical imperfections, glitches, and spotty matchmaking, detracting from an otherwise polished experience. Vandal and VideoGamer pointed out varying frame rates impacting gameplay consistency and stability issues in certain modes. Overall, the consensus among critics is that while Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege offers a solid gaming experience across platforms, technical issues such as network connectivity problems, hit detection issues, frame rate inconsistencies, and occasional glitches hinder the gameplay experience. Critics like The Daily Dot, Polygon, and We Got This Covered emphasized the impact of these technical issues on gameplay, especially in competitive scenarios. Despite efforts from developers to address some of these issues, as noted by PCWorld, the game still struggles with connectivity issues and bugs on all platforms, impacting the overall enjoyment for players.

TL;DR

technical performance

Rainbow Six Siege gets mixed reviews on technical performance across gaming platforms, with PS5 praised for stability and new player experience, while PS4 faces network and graphical challenges. Critics highlight issues like unreliable connections, frame rate variations, and glitches, impacting gameplay. Despite efforts to address problems, technical issues persist on all platforms, affecting overall enjoyment for players in competitive scenarios.

Replay Value

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive (80-100)

31%

Mixed (50-79)

62%

Negative (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

In terms of positives, several critics highlighted the diverse gameplay modes, strategic depth, and tactical choices offered by Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege. Critics like Worth Playing and Softpedia praised the game for its excellent replayability, with Softpedia specifically mentioning the focus on destruction and variety in maps, Operators, and tactical choices that keep the core shooter mechanics fresh in the long term. The cooperative modes, engaging multiplayer modes, and the need for teamwork and coordination were also commended by critics such as Push Square and Gameplanet, emphasizing the satisfying progression and longevity these aspects bring to the gameplay experience. On the negative side, criticisms were raised by multiple reviewers regarding the lack of content, limited maps, and repetitive gameplay elements in Rainbow Six Siege. Critics like Game Rant and GRYOnline.pl mentioned the game's limited content, lack of variety in game modes, and missed potential for a story campaign, which could lead to gameplay feeling repetitive and running out of steam quickly. Additionally, issues with microtransactions, reliance on free DLC promises for content updates, and grindy progression systems tied to unlocking content were noted by critics such as Attack of the Fanboy and Xbox Achievements as potential hindrances to long-term engagement and enjoyment. Overall, the consensus among the critics regarding the replay value of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege is mixed. While the game is praised for its strategic depth, diverse operators, and engaging multiplayer modes that offer tense and unique gameplay experiences, concerns about limited content, lackluster range of maps, reliance on microtransactions, and the need for future free content updates to address these issues are prevalent. Critics like GameStar and Hobby Consolas acknowledge the game's potential for replay value in cooperative play and the promise of free content updates but also highlight the repetitive nature of gameplay due to limited maps and game modes. Despite these criticisms, critics like Guardian and COGconnected appreciate the game's diverse gameplay modes, unique operator abilities, and strategic depth, ultimately recognizing its high replay value for players seeking a tactical multiplayer experience.

TL;DR

replay value

Critics praised Rainbow Six Siege for its diverse gameplay modes, strategic depth, and replayability, highlighting the focus on teamwork and engaging multiplayer experiences. However, concerns were raised about limited content, repetitive gameplay, and issues with microtransactions and progression systems. Overall, opinions on the game's replay value are mixed, with some acknowledging its strengths in tactical gameplay but also pointing out areas that need improvement for long-term engagement.

Overall Verdict

CRITIK

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Critik Score

Positive (80-100)

53%

Mixed (50-79)

46%

Negative (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

In analyzing the opinions of the critics, it is evident that Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege has garnered praise for its unique concept, tactical depth, and emphasis on teamwork. Critics like Worth Playing and Metro GameCentral commend the game for providing a solid foundation for competitive gameplay with strategic elements that reward patience and quick thinking. The destructible environments, diverse Operator abilities, and immersive sound design, as highlighted by PlaySense and GameStar, contribute to an engaging multiplayer experience. The game's emphasis on communication mechanics, intense gameplay, and the potential for skill development, as noted by PlaySense and MondoXbox, further enhance its appeal to players seeking a dynamic and strategic multiplayer experience. On the flip side, criticisms of Rainbow Six Siege primarily revolve around issues such as technical problems, lack of content, and the presence of microtransactions. Critics like PlayStation Universe and GameCrate highlight concerns about the tedious tutorial, potential player retention issues, and lack of proper player education impacting the overall experience. The game's limited map roster, bugs, connectivity issues, and lack of single-player depth, as mentioned by Brash Games and DarkStation, also detract from the overall enjoyment for some players. Additionally, the progression system, network problems, and lackluster content, as criticized by Polygon and IGN, contribute to moments of frustration overshadowing the game's strengths. Overall, the consensus among the critics leans towards Rainbow Six Siege being a compelling multiplayer experience that excels in tactical gameplay and teamwork mechanics but falls short in certain areas such as content variety, technical performance, and progression issues. While some critics like Game Rant and GameCrate acknowledge the game's strengths in gameplay, graphics, and strategic depth, others like Everyeye.it and We Got This Covered point out the shortcomings in balancing, connectivity, and lack of innovation. Despite its flaws, the game is recognized for offering a unique and engaging multiplayer experience that rewards coordination and strategy, appealing to players who enjoy team-based FPS games. Critics' varying opinions highlight the game's mixed qualities, with some recommending it for its intense battles and destructibility, while others caution about its limitations and technical challenges.

TL;DR

Critics praise Rainbow Six Siege for its unique concept, tactical depth, and teamwork emphasis, offering a solid foundation for competitive gameplay with destructible environments and diverse Operator abilities. However, criticisms focus on technical issues, lack of content, and microtransactions, impacting player experience. Overall, while the game excels in tactical gameplay, it falls short in content variety and technical performance, offering a compelling multiplayer experience marred by some shortcomings.

CRITIK

Reviews

139 reviews found

Riot Pixels

Dec 23, 2015