Links

Playstation

Twitch

CRITIK

Styx: Shards of Darkness

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Styx: Shards of Darkness
Item: Styx: Shards of Darkness
Author: Critik Editorial Team

2017

GenresAdventure, Action, Third Person Perspective, RPG, Single Player, Multiplayer

AvailableMar 14, 2017

PlatformPC, Xbox One, PlayStation 4

DeveloperCyanide

Overview

Embark upon a stealthy adventure with new enemies, new environments, and a plethora of new mechanics aimed at refining the abilities and movement of Styx; grappling around corners, climbing ropes, and using his trusty knife as a zip-wire. Shards of Darkness aims to offer unparalleled freedom of movement, along with refined stealth and assassination mechanics, expanding and improving on the strengths of Styx: Master of Shadows

Elsewhere

6.8

Game analysis

Critik Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive (80-100)

20%

Mixed (50-79)

72%

Negative (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The opinions of the critics regarding the Story of Styx: Shards of Darkness are quite varied. Some critics, such as DarkStation and GameWatcher, appreciate the story and find it interesting, with DarkStation mentioning that it follows the Goblin-antihero Styx on a series of missions to investigate and thwart an evil priestess. GameWatcher also highlights the quirky and character-driven story, with a foul-mouthed Goblin protagonist who breaks the fourth wall. These positive opinions suggest that the story has depth and engaging elements that keep players entertained. On the other hand, there are critics who express negative views about the story. Gameplanet criticizes it as poorly written and making little sense, with an unlikeable and irritating main character. COGconnected also finds the story unengaging and lacking depth, while Wccftech mentions that it feels rushed and almost forgotten, lacking depth and world-building. These negative opinions indicate that the story may suffer from weak writing, inconsistent plot development, and uninteresting characters. Overall, the consensus among the critics leans towards a mixed reception of the story in Styx: Shards of Darkness. While some critics appreciate the character-driven and quirky nature of the story, others find it poorly written and lacking depth. The positive aspects mentioned by critics such as DarkStation and GameWatcher suggest that the story has its moments of intrigue and entertainment. However, the negative opinions from Gameplanet and COGconnected highlight the weaknesses in the storytelling, indicating that the plot may not be compelling or well-executed. It is worth noting that some critics, like Trusted Reviews and Push Square, mention that the story has its moments and is enjoyable, but it may not be the strongest aspect of the game. Overall, the mixed opinions suggest that the story in Styx: Shards of Darkness may not be a standout feature, but it still manages to provide some entertainment value for players.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Critics are divided on the story in Styx: Shards of Darkness. Some praise its depth and engaging elements, highlighting the quirky Goblin protagonist, while others criticize it as poorly written and lacking depth. Overall, opinions vary from appreciating its entertainment value to finding it unengaging and forgettable.

Gameplay Mechanics

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive (80-100)

77%

Mixed (50-79)

20%

Negative (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The opinions of the critics regarding the gameplay of Styx: Shards of Darkness are generally positive. Many critics praise the game for its strong emphasis on stealth and the ability to approach challenges in multiple ways. GameGrin, GameStar, Gameplanet, Impulsegamer, PC Gamer, The Games Machine, TrueAchievements, Twinfinite, ZTGD, CGMagazine, GameSpew, Gaming Nexus, God is a Geek, Hardcore Gamer, PlayStation LifeStyle, Push Square, Stevivor, TheSixthAxis, Video Chums, Wccftech, and Worth Playing all highlight the game's focus on stealth and the various tools and abilities available to players to navigate through the levels. They commend the game for providing multiple sneaky routes, rewarding creative experimentation, and offering a variety of options for dispatching enemies stealthily. The smooth and fluid controls, seamless movement, and improved acrobatics are also mentioned positively by Hooked Gamers and COGconnected. However, there are some criticisms regarding the gameplay of Styx: Shards of Darkness. DarkStation mentions that melee combat is not effective and stealth is the only viable path, while GameWatcher states that the abilities of the protagonist are helpful but underpowered. XboxAddict and COGconnected point out issues with the game's mechanics, such as imprecise gameplay mechanics, problems with the cover system, and unexpected deaths or fail states that feel out of the player's control. Video Chums also mentions that the gameplay can be frustrating and tedious at times. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that Styx: Shards of Darkness offers an enjoyable and immersive stealth experience. The game's focus on proper stealth, multiple sneaky routes, and various tools for stealth, such as distraction and silent dispatching of enemies, are highly praised. The level design is also commended for providing alternative routes and rewarding creative approaches. The smooth controls, improved movement, and acrobatics add to the overall positive gameplay experience. However, there are some criticisms regarding the effectiveness of melee combat, underpowered abilities, and issues with certain mechanics. Despite these criticisms, the majority of critics agree that Styx: Shards of Darkness delivers a strong stealth gameplay experience with multiple routes and abilities to use.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Critics rave about Styx: Shards of Darkness for its strong stealth focus, multiple sneaky routes, and creative gameplay options. Praise for smooth controls and immersive experience, but some critics find issues with combat effectiveness and game mechanics. Overall, Styx offers an enjoyable stealth adventure with room for improvement.

Graphics and Visual Design

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive (80-100)

56%

Mixed (50-79)

44%

Negative (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

In terms of the Graphics and Visual Design of Styx: Shards of Darkness, the majority of critics have praised the game for its visually appealing and diverse environments. Critics such as DarkStation and Hooked Gamers highlight the game's levels as being darkly beautiful, crammed with detail, hidden treasures, secret passages, and multiple paths. Gameplanet also commends the visuals, mentioning flawless animations and expansive levels. Trusted Reviews further adds that the game has Unreal 4-powered visuals that wouldn't disgrace a AAA title, with interesting scenery and strong character design. The game's attention to art and level design is also noted by GameCritics, who mention varied settings and expanded options for traversal. Additionally, critics like PC Gamer and ICXM mention the impressive external locations, well-animated movements, and large, expansive environments. However, there are some criticisms regarding the Graphics and Visual Design of Styx: Shards of Darkness. GameWatcher mentions that while the character models and environments are top-notch, the quality of animations and lip-sync during cutscenes is lacking. Impulsegamer echoes this sentiment, stating that the visuals are generally lovely, but the lip syncing in cutscenes is subpar. PlayStation LifeStyle also notes that character animations in cutscenes still look awkward. Push Square mentions that the game is not visually impressive and suffers from constant texture pop-in. TheSixthAxis adds that while the game features more color and variety in environments, texture pop-in issues remain. Wccftech goes even further, stating that the graphics are weak and the animations are clunky and not fluid. Overall, the consensus among critics is that Styx: Shards of Darkness has visually compelling and distinct areas, with impressive level designs and attention to detail. The game's environments are praised for their beauty, detail, and variety, with expansive levels and flawless animations. However, there are criticisms regarding the quality of animations and lip-sync during cutscenes, as well as occasional issues with texture pop-in. Despite these flaws, the majority of critics agree that the game's Graphics and Visual Design are visually stunning and contribute to the overall experience of the game.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Critics praise Styx: Shards of Darkness for visually appealing environments, diverse levels, and flawless animations. However, criticisms include subpar lip-sync in cutscenes and texture pop-in issues. Overall, the game's graphics are stunning with impressive level designs, despite some flaws in animation quality.

Music and Sound Design

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive (80-100)

20%

Mixed (50-79)

80%

Negative (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The opinions of the critics regarding the Sound Design and Music of Styx: Shards of Darkness are varied, but overall, there are several positive aspects highlighted. The voice acting is often praised, with critics like Critical Hit and TrueAchievements commending the voice cast for bringing the protagonist Styx to life with smart remarks, cynicism, and a dark personality. The voice acting for the main character is also considered the best in the game by Gameplanet. Additionally, Trusted Reviews mentions that the actor playing Styx gives the role enough oomph to elevate some pedestrian dialogue and voicework elsewhere. The brooding soundtrack, as mentioned by XboxAddict, sets a dreary mood and ties everything together, while the low-key orchestral soundtrack, as noted by Worth Playing, accentuates the gameplay. However, there are also some negative opinions regarding the Sound Design and Music of the game. GameGrin mentions that the audio mixing is a bit iffy, which could potentially affect the overall experience. Gameplanet finds the constant commentary from the main character to be irritating, which could be seen as a drawback for some players. GameCritics notes that while most of the game is playable without sound, some plot elements can be missed as subtitles become disabled when the character moves away from important interactions. ICXM criticizes the stunted delivery of the voice acting from human characters, suggesting a lack of quality in comparison to Styx's performance. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the Sound Design and Music of Styx: Shards of Darkness have both positive and negative aspects. The voice acting, particularly for the protagonist Styx, is generally well-received, with its sarcastic and dark personality shining through. The brooding soundtrack and low-key orchestral soundtrack are also praised for setting the mood and accentuating the gameplay. However, there are some criticisms regarding audio mixing, constant commentary, and stunted delivery of voice acting from certain characters. Despite these negatives, the overall sentiment leans towards a positive reception of the Sound Design and Music in Styx: Shards of Darkness.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Critics have mixed opinions on the sound design and music of Styx: Shards of Darkness. Positive highlights include praised voice acting for the protagonist Styx and atmospheric soundtracks. However, some critics find issues with audio mixing, constant commentary, and stunted delivery from other characters. Overall, while there are drawbacks, the general consensus leans towards a positive reception of the game's sound design and music.

Voice Acting

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive (80-100)

30%

Mixed (50-79)

65%

Negative (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting for Styx: Shards of Darkness receives a mixed reception from the critics. Some reviewers, such as GameGrin and The Games Machine, praise the voice actor for Styx, stating that it is spot on and that the protagonist's intense and cynical personality can make players smile. Styx's voice acting is also described as entertaining and refreshing by PlayStation LifeStyle, with witty jokes and references adding to the enjoyment. Additionally, Impulsegamer highlights Styx's sass and taunting of the player as positive aspects of the voice acting. On the other hand, there are critics who express negative opinions about the voice acting. DarkStation mentions an uneasy disconnection between the dark tone of the story and Styx's foul-mouthed and snarky dialogue. GameWatcher believes that the voice acting could be better, and COGconnected finds the main character's voice acting obnoxious and annoying. PC Gamer states that Styx's sarcastic and belligerent shtick makes him hard to love, while Twinfinite mentions that the dialogue and voice acting can be cringy. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the voice acting for Styx: Shards of Darkness has its strengths and weaknesses. While some reviewers appreciate the humor, charm, and spot-on portrayal of Styx, others feel that the voice acting lacks depth of character or is not well executed. Trusted Reviews acknowledges that the actor playing Styx gives the role enough oomph to keep attention, but mentions that the dialogue and voicework elsewhere are pedestrian. ICXM notes that the voice acting from human characters suffers from stunted delivery, and ZTGD states that while Styx himself is humorous, the rest of the game lacks character. Despite the mixed opinions, it can be concluded that the voice acting in Styx: Shards of Darkness is a subjective aspect of the game that may appeal to some players while leaving others less impressed.

TL;DR

voice acting

Critics are divided on the voice acting in Styx: Shards of Darkness. Some praise Styx's witty and entertaining dialogue, while others find it disconnected from the dark tone of the story. Overall, opinions vary on whether the voice acting adds charm or falls flat, making it a subjective aspect of the game that may resonate with some players and disappoint others.

Technical Performance

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive (80-100)

20%

Mixed (50-79)

60%

Negative (0-49)

20%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

Overall, the opinions of the critics regarding the technical performance of Styx: Shards of Darkness vary depending on the gaming platform. On PC, the game receives mixed reviews. Critical Hit mentions frame drops and AI issues but still finds the game playable. DarkStation acknowledges frustrating imprecise jumps and sparing checkpoints but praises the well-tuned controls and fluid movement. GameGrin describes the game as well polished with good production values. GameWatcher states that the game runs well on PC with no major issues or hitches. Trusted Reviews notes that while the AI is not particularly ingenious, it is solid and consistent. On Xbox One, the technical performance of Styx: Shards of Darkness is generally positive. Twinfinite mentions minor issues with texture pop-in and controls, but they do not significantly impact the overall experience. ZTGD states that performance is fine on Xbox One with very few instances of frame rate problems. On PS4, the technical performance of the game receives more negative feedback. CGMagazine describes the game as flawed and janky, with mechanical rigidity and awkward controls. COGconnected mentions that the game feels unpolished overall. Push Square highlights occasional buggy AI, texture pop-in, and a random hard crash. TheSixthAxis mentions finicky controls, poor and buggy AI, and baffling checkpointing. However, Worth Playing notes stable frame rates, quick load times, and only occasional issues with camera panning. In summary, the technical performance of Styx: Shards of Darkness is generally better on PC and Xbox One compared to the PS4. PC reviewers highlight some issues but generally find the game playable and well-polished. Xbox One reviewers mention only minor issues with performance. However, PS4 reviewers consistently mention flaws such as janky mechanics, awkward controls, and problematic AI. Despite these negative aspects, some reviewers on all platforms still find redeeming qualities in the game, such as solid performance, good production values, and quick loading times.

TL;DR

technical performance

Styx: Shards of Darkness tech performance varies by platform. PC has mixed reviews, Xbox One is positive with minor issues, and PS4 gets negative feedback for janky mechanics and awkward controls. Overall, PC and Xbox One perform better, while PS4 faces more problems. Some reviewers still find redeeming qualities in the game across all platforms.

Replay Value

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive (80-100)

31%

Mixed (50-79)

69%

Negative (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The opinions of the critics regarding the replay value of Styx: Shards of Darkness are generally positive. Many critics highlight the various incentives and secrets that encourage players to replay levels. Critical Hit and GameGrin both mention the presence of skill trees and collectibles that extend gameplay and increase replayability. GameStar emphasizes the ability to replay missions from the base camp and the additional medals that can be earned for different achievements, such as speed and non-killed enemies. TrueAchievements also notes the multiple skill trees and achievements that require multiple playthroughs, further enhancing the replay value. The Games Machine mentions that completing all missions and collecting everything can extend the playtime beyond the initial 15 hours. PlayStation LifeStyle highlights the option to replay missions for higher scores or missed objectives, as well as the multiple ways to traverse and complete objectives. However, there are some negative opinions regarding the replay value of Styx: Shards of Darkness. Twinfinite mentions that the lackluster characters might not provide much replay value beyond the first playthrough. PC Gamer mentions that although the game offers a flexible skill system, the reviewer found themselves skipping certain skill trees, suggesting that not all options may be equally appealing to players. Worth Playing also points out that the game reuses some environments instead of introducing new ones, which may diminish the sense of novelty and replayability. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that Styx: Shards of Darkness has good replay value. The presence of skill trees, collectibles, and achievements that require multiple playthroughs provide incentives for players to revisit the game. The option to replay missions, the multiple routes and approaches in level design, and the availability of co-op mode also contribute to the game's replayability. While there are some minor drawbacks, such as lackluster characters and reused environments, the overall sentiment is positive, with many critics highlighting the game's ability to constantly engage players and encourage multiple playthroughs.

TL;DR

replay value

Critics generally praise Styx: Shards of Darkness for its strong replay value due to incentives like skill trees, collectibles, and achievements, as well as the option to replay missions and explore different routes. Some critics mention drawbacks like lackluster characters and reused environments, but overall, the consensus is positive, with the game offering engaging gameplay that encourages multiple playthroughs.

Overall Verdict

CRITIK

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Critik Score

Positive (80-100)

29%

Mixed (50-79)

70%

Negative (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

Styx: Shards of Darkness receives a generally positive reception from the critics, with several praising its improvements over its predecessor and its focus on stealth gameplay. The game is commended for its entertaining and challenging stealth mechanics, with critics like DarkStation and GameWatcher highlighting its fun and rewarding gameplay. The traversal mechanics and level design are also praised, with DarkStation stating that they make the game enjoyable overall. The game is described as a solid sequel that knows what it wants to be, as mentioned by Gaming Nexus. The improvements in production value and adaptable stealth mechanics are also noted by CGMagazine. The game's generous amount of content and flexible skill system, as mentioned by PC Gamer, are also positive aspects that encourage and reward creative thinking. However, there are some criticisms regarding Styx: Shards of Darkness. The story is often criticized for being poorly written, repetitive, and lacking in narrative development, as mentioned by Gameplanet and GameSpew. The voice acting and AI are also mentioned as lacking by GameWatcher. The puerile humor and irritating main character are noted by Gameplanet as detracting from the overall experience. The frequently frustrating and tedious gameplay is mentioned by Video Chums, who state that it makes the game feel like a chore. The bugs and inconsistencies in the game are also highlighted by TheSixthAxis, who state that it holds the game back from being a big step forward. Overall, the critics agree that Styx: Shards of Darkness is an enjoyable stealth game with some flaws. The game is praised for its improvements over its predecessor, its entertaining stealth mechanics, and its focus on rewarding creative thinking. The game's traversal mechanics, level design, and sarcastic goblin character are also mentioned as positive aspects. However, the game is criticized for its poorly written story, repetitive level design, and irritating main character. The voice acting, AI, bugs, and tedious gameplay are also mentioned as negatives. Despite these flaws, the overall consensus is that Styx: Shards of Darkness is a solid stealth game that offers an enjoyable experience for fans of the genre, as recommended by critics like Hardcore Gamer and Push Square.

TL;DR

Critics praise Styx: Shards of Darkness for its improved stealth gameplay, fun mechanics, and solid sequel status, but criticize its weak story, repetitive levels, and frustrating gameplay. Overall, it's seen as an enjoyable stealth game with flaws, offering a rewarding experience for genre fans.

CRITIK

Reviews

114 reviews found

Hooked Gamers

Mar 15, 2017