Life is Strange: Double Exposure cover image

Links

Steam

Twitch

CRITIK

Life is Strange: Double Exposure

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Life is Strange: Double Exposure
Item: Life is Strange: Double Exposure
Author: Critik Editorial Team

2024

GenresAdventure, Action, Drama, Single Player

AvailableOct 29, 2024

PlatformPlayStation 5, PC, Nintendo Switch, Xbox Series X

DeveloperDeck Nine Games

Overview

Max Caulfield, photographer-in-residence at the prestigious Caledon University, discovers her closest new friend Safi dead in the snow. Murdered. To save her, Max tries to Rewind time – a power she’s not used in years… Instead, Max opens the way to a parallel timeline where Safi is still alive and still in danger! Max realizes the killer will soon strike again – in both versions of reality. Only Max can Shift between the two parallel timelines to solve and prevent the same murder.

Elsewhere

Game analysis

Critik Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive (80-100)

67%

Mixed (50-79)

Negative (0-49)

27%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The opinions of the critics regarding the story of Life is Strange: Double Exposure are varied, with some highlighting the positives of the narrative. GamingBolt and COGconnected praise the gripping tale with surprising twists, well-developed characters, and a strong central mystery that leaves a mark on the story. Digital Chumps also commends the emotional depth, character growth, and exploration of themes like trauma and societal expectations, indicating a strong narrative foundation. On the other hand, some critics express concerns about the story of Life is Strange: Double Exposure. IGN Brasil notes that the game lacks the emotional impact of the original, focusing more on superpowers than social themes. Noisy Pixel criticizes the confusing dual-timeline mechanic and characters that are hard to connect with, leading to a disjointed experience. Dexerto feels that the narrative feels too familiar and lacks depth in character development, focusing too much on mystery over relationships. Overall, while there is praise for the gripping tale, surprising twists, and well-developed characters in Life is Strange: Double Exposure, there are also criticisms regarding the lack of emotional impact, confusing mechanics, and shallow character development. Critics like God is a Geek and GamesHub appreciate the mature and emotionally impactful story, clever twists, and character development, while Metro GameCentral and RPG Fan express dissatisfaction with the handling of characters and unresolved plot points. The general consensus seems to be that the game offers an intriguing narrative with some standout elements but falls short in fully delivering on the emotional depth and character-driven storytelling of the original Life is Strange.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Critics have mixed opinions on Life is Strange: Double Exposure. Some praise its gripping tale, well-developed characters, and strong mystery, while others criticize its lack of emotional impact, confusing mechanics, and shallow character development. Overall, the game offers an intriguing narrative with some standout elements but falls short on emotional depth and character-driven storytelling compared to the original Life is Strange.

Gameplay Mechanics

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive (80-100)

36%

Mixed (50-79)

50%

Negative (0-49)

14%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of Life is Strange: Double Exposure has received a mix of positive and negative feedback from critics. Several reviewers praised the engaging choice-and-consequence mechanics, such as GamingBolt and IGN, highlighting how they make players think about their decisions and add depth to the overall experience. The introduction of new time powers, as mentioned by GamingBolt and IGN Brasil, was also commended for bringing a fresh element to the gameplay. Critics like COGconnected appreciated how the game integrated puzzles with the timeline mechanic, allowing for exploration of different versions of areas and characters, providing players with more freedom and clever interactions. On the other hand, some critics expressed concerns about certain aspects of the gameplay in Life is Strange: Double Exposure. Noisy Pixel criticized the poorly executed dual-timeline mechanic, which led to frustration and detracted from immersion. The repetitive exploration mentioned by Noisy Pixel made the experience feel tedious for some players. Dexerto felt that the gameplay mechanic of shifting between two timelines, while clever, could have been fleshed out more, with the ability to take photos feeling underutilized. RPG Fan's critique of fetch quests dominating the gameplay, turning sections into tedious chores and hindering the narrative momentum, also highlighted a negative aspect of the game. Overall, the consensus among critics regarding the gameplay of Life is Strange: Double Exposure leans towards a positive reception, with the innovative mechanics like choice-and-consequence, time powers, and dual-timeline shifting being highlighted as strengths. However, there are also concerns raised about the execution of these mechanics, such as lack of clarity on objectives, repetitive elements, and pacing issues. Despite some criticisms, the majority of reviewers appreciated the unique gameplay elements that added depth to the storytelling and puzzle-solving aspects of the game, making it an engaging experience for players who enjoy narrative-driven adventures with interactive decision-making.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Critics had mixed feelings about the gameplay in Life is Strange: Double Exposure. Positives included engaging choice-and-consequence mechanics, new time powers, and integration of puzzles with the timeline mechanic. However, concerns were raised about poorly executed dual-timeline mechanics, repetitive exploration, underutilized photo-taking abilities, and fetch quests hindering narrative momentum. Overall, while innovative gameplay elements were praised, there were criticisms about execution issues, repetitive elements, and pacing problems.

Graphics and Visual Design

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive (80-100)

82%

Mixed (50-79)

18%

Negative (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The majority of critics unanimously praised the Graphics and Visual Design of Life is Strange: Double Exposure, highlighting various positive aspects of the game. Critics like IGN Brasil and Digital Chumps commended the stunning visuals, blending realism with the franchise's signature art style, and the improved technical prowess, including accurate lip syncing and detailed character work that enhances the setting and atmosphere. The game's vibrant use of color, emotive character models, and visually expressive facial animations were also lauded by reviewers such as COGconnected and GamesRadar++. The attention to detail in environments, character design, and impressive character animations were particularly noted by Dexerto and God is a Geek, setting a new standard for the series and reflecting Max's struggles and vulnerability effectively. While the overall sentiment towards the Graphics and Visual Design of Life is Strange: Double Exposure was overwhelmingly positive, there were a few criticisms mentioned by some reviewers. GamingBolt pointed out rough edges like texture pop-in and animation bugs, which slightly detracted from the otherwise visually impressive experience. IGN noted that the world in the game was smaller than in previous entries, which may have limited the scope for some players. Additionally, MeuPlayStation mentioned that some fans disliked the changes in Max's appearance, indicating a potential point of contention among players regarding character design choices. In conclusion, the consensus among critics is that Life is Strange: Double Exposure excels in its Graphics and Visual Design, with the majority of reviewers praising the game for its beautiful cinematography, impressive environmental design, and attention to detail in character animations. The game is lauded for setting a new standard in the series, with stunning visuals that enhance the reflective moments and emotional depth of the narrative. Despite some minor issues mentioned by a few critics, the overall sentiment is overwhelmingly positive, with the game being hailed as a visual masterpiece that successfully captures the essence of the Life is Strange franchise.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Life is Strange: Double Exposure's graphics and visual design received glowing reviews from critics for its stunning visuals, improved technical prowess, vibrant colors, and emotive character models. Despite minor criticisms like texture pop-in and character design changes, the game sets a new standard in the series with its beautiful cinematography and attention to detail, earning praise as a visual masterpiece that enhances the narrative's emotional depth.

Music and Sound Design

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive (80-100)

86%

Mixed (50-79)

14%

Negative (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The majority of critics praised the Sound Design and Music of Life is Strange: Double Exposure for its exceptional quality and emotional impact. IGN highlighted the original music by Tessa Rose Jackson as exceptional, capturing emotions and enhancing the tone of each reality. COGconnected appreciated the perfectly selected songs that enhanced the emotional impact of each scene, along with the voice acting and natural gestures that added a believable layer to interactions. God is a Geek specifically mentioned standout tracks like 'Illusion' and 'Someone Was Listening', contributing to the overall immersive experience. The beautiful, reflective indie soundtrack mentioned by GamesHub also received positive feedback, enhancing the narrative experience. Despite the overwhelmingly positive reception, RPG Fan pointed out persistent audio issues that could disrupt immersion in the game. This critique highlights a potential drawback in an otherwise well-received aspect of the game. While the majority of critics praised the Sound Design and Music, it is essential to address and potentially improve upon any technical issues that may hinder the overall experience for players. Overall, the consensus among critics is that the Sound Design and Music of Life is Strange: Double Exposure are very good, with the soundtrack being a standout feature of the game. Metro GameCentral described the soundtrack as excellent, further emphasizing the positive reception. The emotional depth, immersive experience, and effective enhancement of the narrative through music were consistently highlighted by various critics. Despite some minor audio issues mentioned by RPG Fan, the general sentiment leans heavily towards the exceptional quality and positive impact of the Sound Design and Music in the game.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Critics raved about the Sound Design and Music in Life is Strange: Double Exposure, with high praise for the emotional impact and exceptional quality. Original music by Tessa Rose Jackson and standout tracks like 'Illusion' and 'Someone Was Listening' were particularly highlighted. While some critics noted audio issues, overall consensus is overwhelmingly positive, with the soundtrack being a standout feature that enhances the immersive experience and narrative depth of the game.

Voice Acting

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive (80-100)

63%

Mixed (50-79)

25%

Negative (0-49)

13%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in Life is Strange: Double Exposure has received a mix of positive and negative feedback from critics. Critics like GamingBolt, COGconnected, Digital Chumps, GamesHub, GamesRadar++, and Metro GameCentral have praised the voice acting for adding depth and believability to the characters. They appreciate the diverse cast of characters and the strong performances that bring them to life. Digital Chumps specifically highlighted Hannah Telle's return as Max Caulfield, noting how it enhances the emotional depth of the game. GamesRadar++ and Metro GameCentral also singled out specific characters like those from Caledon University and Amanda for their brilliant portrayals, adding to the overall immersive experience. On the other hand, critics like Noisy Pixel and Shacknews have pointed out some weaknesses in the voice acting department. Noisy Pixel mentioned weak character chemistry and forced dialogue, which hindered the connection with the new cast. Shacknews noted stilted dialogue in some instances, affecting the immersion during conversations. These criticisms suggest that while the voice acting in Life is Strange: Double Exposure has its strengths, there are areas where it falls short in terms of creating a seamless and engaging experience for players. Overall, the consensus among critics leans towards the positive side when it comes to the voice acting in Life is Strange: Double Exposure. The majority of reviewers appreciate the efforts put into the performances, the diverse cast, and the emotional depth brought to the characters. However, there are valid concerns raised by critics like Noisy Pixel and Shacknews regarding aspects like character chemistry and dialogue delivery. Despite these criticisms, the general sentiment is that the voice acting contributes significantly to the overall immersive experience of the game, with standout performances that breathe life into the world of Caledon University.

TL;DR

voice acting

Critics are divided on the voice acting in Life is Strange: Double Exposure. While some praised the performances for depth and believability, others criticized weak chemistry and forced dialogue. Overall, the voice acting adds immersion and emotional depth to the game, but there are areas that fall short.

Technical Performance

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive (80-100)

Mixed (50-79)

56%

Negative (0-49)

44%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

In terms of the technical performance on Xbox Series X, there is a mix of positives and negatives highlighted by the critics. GamingBolt noted some technical rough edges like texture pop-in and animation bugs but deemed them not game-breaking. IGN Brasil mentioned improvements in technical performance compared to preview versions, with fewer issues like texture loading delays and FPS drops. However, Noisy Pixel and Shacknews reported significant game-breaking bugs, performance issues, and crashes, affecting the gameplay experience negatively. Overall, while there are improvements in technical performance on Xbox Series X, the presence of game-breaking bugs and performance issues is a concern. On the other hand, the technical performance on PS5 received a more mixed reception from the critics. COGconnected and Digital Chumps highlighted minor graphical glitches and technical issues like texture pop-in, but they were rare and did not significantly impact the overall experience. However, Metro GameCentral, MeuPlayStation, and RPG Fan reported encountering game-stopping bugs, visual bugs, lighting issues, and audio bugs that disrupted gameplay and impacted the overall experience negatively. RPG Fan specifically mentioned the absence of basic quality-of-life features compounding the frustration caused by technical issues. The presence of such game-breaking bugs and technical issues on PS5 raises concerns about the game's stability and performance on this platform. Overall, the consensus among the critics regarding the technical performance of Life is Strange: Double Exposure is mixed. While there are some improvements noted on both Xbox Series X and PS5 in terms of technical performance, the presence of game-breaking bugs, performance issues, and crashes significantly affected the gameplay experience for some critics. Positive aspects like minor graphical glitches being rare and improved technical performance from preview versions were highlighted by a few critics. However, the overall sentiment leans towards concerns about the stability, performance, and technical issues that impact the overall experience of the game across both gaming platforms.

TL;DR

technical performance

Life is Strange: Double Exposure shows technical improvements on Xbox Series X and PS5 but struggles with game-breaking bugs and performance issues that mar the gameplay experience. Critics note some positives like minor graphical glitches being rare, but concerns about stability and technical issues prevail, making for a mixed reception overall.

Replay Value

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive (80-100)

14%

Mixed (50-79)

57%

Negative (0-49)

29%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The critics generally agree that Life is Strange: Double Exposure offers replay value through its branching narrative and impactful choices. IGN highlights the game's different outcomes based on choices, making replaying worthwhile to explore various paths. COGconnected praises the narrative complexity and character development, emphasizing how choices impact relationships with supporting cast members and the ability to explore different timelines. This positive aspect of replay value is further echoed by IGN Brasil, who notes that fans of the franchise can reconnect with familiar characters and environments while experiencing a new story. However, there are some criticisms regarding the replay value of the game. RPG Fan expresses disappointment in the lack of significant narrative divergence between the main routes, making revisiting the game less appealing. They also mention unresolved storylines and the game's short length as factors contributing to low replay value. Metro GameCentral points out that while the game offers choices reflecting possible endings of the original Life is Strange, the shifting mechanic may impact emotional investment in choices, potentially reducing the desire to replay. Additionally, MeuPlayStation highlights how the connection to the previous Life is Strange title may affect the replay value for some players. Overall, the consensus among critics is that Life is Strange: Double Exposure has replay value, primarily driven by its branching narrative, impactful choices, and the opportunity to explore different outcomes. While some critics express concerns about narrative divergence, unresolved storylines, and emotional engagement, the general sentiment is positive towards the game's ability to offer fans of the franchise a chance to delve into new stories while revisiting familiar elements. Critics like IGN and COGconnected appreciate the depth of interactions and character development, contributing to the overall replayability of the game.

TL;DR

replay value

Life is Strange: Double Exposure offers replay value with its interactive storytelling and impactful decisions, praised by critics for its branching narrative and character development. While some express concerns about narrative divergence and emotional engagement, the game still provides fans with the opportunity to explore different paths and reconnect with familiar elements from the franchise.

Overall Verdict

CRITIK

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Critik Score

Positive (80-100)

49%

Mixed (50-79)

46%

Negative (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

Life is Strange: Double Exposure has received praise from several critics for its compelling story, engaging gameplay mechanics, and strong character development. Critics like COGconnected and GamesHub appreciated the game's strong writing, captivating murder mystery, and emotionally engaging experience. The introduction of new gameplay mechanics, such as the dual-timeline mechanic, was also highlighted positively by critics like GAMES.CH, adding a fresh element to the franchise while maintaining a good balance between guidance and challenge. The reflective soundtrack and excellent performances were noted as contributing factors to the overall immersive experience, as mentioned by GamesHub. On the other hand, Life is Strange: Double Exposure faced criticism from reviewers who felt that the game fell short in certain areas. Noisy Pixel and Shacknews pointed out technical issues that hindered the overall experience, including weak character chemistry and a confusing dual-timeline mechanic. IGN Brasil mentioned that the game focused more on superpowers than the social themes that made the original memorable, which led to a lack of emotional impact compared to its predecessor. Metro GameCentral also highlighted the lack of player choice and clunky writing as drawbacks that prevented the game from reaching its full potential. Overall, the consensus among critics regarding Life is Strange: Double Exposure is mixed. While some critics, like GamingBolt and God is a Geek, praised the game for its gripping story, engaging gameplay, and strong characters, others, such as RPG Fan and Dexerto, expressed disappointment in the poor character development, technical issues, and unresolved storylines. The game seems to have successfully continued Max Caulfield's story for some critics, like COGconnected, but for others, like RPG Fan, it failed to capitalize on its premise and deliver a worthy sequel. Despite the differing opinions, most critics acknowledged the game's potential and the intriguing direction it takes the franchise, leaving players with a mix of excitement and reservation about the future of the series.

TL;DR

Life is Strange: Double Exposure receives mixed reviews. Critics praise its compelling story, engaging gameplay, and strong character development, with innovative mechanics like the dual-timeline feature. However, some reviewers criticize technical issues, weak character chemistry, and a focus on superpowers over social themes. The game's immersive experience and gripping narrative divide opinions, leaving players intrigued but cautious about the series' future.

CRITIK

Reviews

147 reviews found

IGN

Xbox Series X

Oct 28, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure is praised for living up to the original, offering a fresh direction, and improving on nearly every aspect, making it a highly recommended experience.

Read full review

GamingBolt

Xbox Series X

Oct 28, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure is an excellent sophomore outing for beloved protagonist Max Caulfield, justifying its existence with a gripping story and engaging gameplay, despite some occasional writing issues and technical rough edges.

Read full review

God is a Geek

PlayStation 5

Oct 28, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure is a brilliant continuation of Max's story, offering a mix of nostalgia and fresh storytelling, supported by strong characters, visuals, and music, despite occasional gameplay clarity issues.

Read full review

Digital Chumps

PlayStation 5

Oct 28, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure is praised for capturing the emotional essence of the series while introducing new elements and mysteries, leaving the reviewer excited for the future of the franchise.

Read full review

GAMES.CH

PlayStation 5

Oct 28, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure offers a compelling and engaging story with a new gameplay mechanic, maintaining a good balance between guidance and challenge, providing a consistently intriguing experience.

Read full review

GamesHub

PlayStation 5

Oct 28, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure is a compelling and emotionally engaging experience with a strong narrative, excellent performances, and a reflective soundtrack, deserving of a high score.

Read full review

COGconnected

PlayStation 5

Oct 28, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure successfully continues the story of Max Caulfield with strong writing, compelling characters, and a captivating murder mystery. While closely connected to its predecessors, the game showcases Deck Nine's expertise in narrative-driven games.

Read full review

MeuPlayStation

PlayStation 5

Oct 28, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure is a competent game with a solid story, engaging gameplay mechanics, and beautiful graphics, but struggles with bugs and the challenge of living up to the legacy of the original title.

Read full review

IGN Brasil

Xbox Series X

Oct 28, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure is a good game but falls short of the emotional impact of the original, focusing more on superpowers than the social themes that made the first game memorable. It still offers an intriguing story and a new direction for the franchise.

Read full review

GamesRadar+

PlayStation 5

Oct 28, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure delivers an intriguing mystery with unexpected twists, featuring a diverse cast of characters and a compelling exploration of supernatural powers. While the shifting mechanic adds a unique gameplay element, it can sometimes hinder emotional connections with the characters. The game sets the stage for a larger narrative, leaving players wanting more.

Read full review