FIFA 21

Summary unavailable

The opinions of the critics regarding the gameplay of FIFA 21: Legacy Edition are varied, with both positive and negative aspects being highlighted. In terms of positives, several critics mention improvements in player movement, responsiveness, and control. GameMAG praises the improvements in physics, dribbling, and player intelligence, with defenders making fewer mistakes and attackers positioning themselves better. They also mention the addition of a new feature that allows players to direct their teammates during attacks. TheGamer also commends the game for feeling different and more realistic, with improvements in ball physics, player reactions, and first touch. Shacknews praises the new controls and improvements to AI performance, stating that the gameplay retains the high level of quality expected from the FIFA franchise. These positive aspects contribute to a more enjoyable and immersive gameplay experience. However, there are also several negative aspects mentioned by critics. One common criticism is the lack of significant changes and innovation in gameplay. Nintendo Life criticizes the lack of new game modes and features, stating that FIFA 21 on the Switch is practically the same as FIFA 20. Gamer.nl criticizes the gameplay changes, stating that the new features do not work well and that the game relies too much on speed. JeuxActu mentions that the gameplay leans more towards offensive strategies, neglecting defensive aspects. They highlight issues with the imbalance between attack and defense, weak goalkeepers, and favorable counters. Everyeye.it mentions that the gameplay tends to be repetitive and unexciting, with teams being more static in midfield and solo play being rewarded over team play. These negative aspects detract from the overall experience and can lead to frustration and a lack of authenticity. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that FIFA 21: Legacy Edition's gameplay has both positive and negative aspects. While there are improvements in player movement, responsiveness, and control, as well as some new features like improved passing mechanics and creative runs, there is a lack of significant changes and innovation. The gameplay tends to favor attacking strategies over defensive play, leading to imbalances and issues with goalkeepers and defensive AI. The lack of new game modes and features is also a point of criticism. However, despite these negatives, the gameplay is generally praised for its enjoyment, responsiveness, and immersion. Critics like GameMAG, TheGamer, and Shacknews highlight the positive aspects of the gameplay, contributing to a mixed overall sentiment.

In analyzing the opinions of multiple reviewers regarding the graphics and visual design of FIFA 21, it is evident that there is a mixed reception. Some critics, such as Gameblog.fr and MondoXbox, praise the game for its beauty and improvement compared to previous FIFA titles. They highlight the realistic player models, detailed stadiums, and improved lighting effects. The next-gen version of FIFA 21 is particularly lauded for its enhanced visuals and more realistic player animations, as mentioned by Jeuxvideo.com and GameSpot. These positive aspects contribute to a visually appealing experience and create a sense of immersion for players. However, there are several criticisms raised by reviewers regarding the graphics and visual design of FIFA 21. Many critics express disappointment in the lack of noticeable improvements compared to FIFA 20. Push Square states that FIFA 21 is falling behind other sports games in terms of visuals, while LevelUp mentions a lack of detail in player models and a lack of improvement in stadium atmosphere. Some critics, such as Atomix and GRYOnline.pl, specifically point out issues with inaccurate player faces, which can detract from the overall visual experience. Other critics, like Finger Guns and 3DJuegos, criticize the Frostbite engine for looking dated and suggest the need for an overhaul. Overall, the consensus among critics leans towards a mixed reception regarding the graphics and visual design of FIFA 21. While there are positive aspects, such as improved player models, detailed stadiums, and enhanced lighting effects, there is a general sentiment that the game lacks significant graphical upgrades compared to its predecessor. Critics like GameStar and TheSixthAxis highlight the striking similarities between FIFA 21 and FIFA 20, with only minor technical changes and customization options for stadiums in Ultimate Team. Some critics also mention licensing issues and graphical shortcomings, which further contribute to the mixed reception. Ultimately, while FIFA 21 has its visual strengths, it falls short in delivering substantial improvements and keeping up with the competition in terms of graphics and visual design.

In terms of the sound design and music of FIFA 21, there are several positive aspects that critics have highlighted. The crowd noise and chants have been praised for their immersive quality and ability to enhance the atmosphere of the game. Critics like Hardcore Gamer and Generación Xbox appreciate the inclusion of separate soundtracks for different game modes, with the latter also highlighting the localization in Spanish and the presence of well-known commentators. The soundtrack itself has been described as impressive by Generación Xbox, with a mix of songs that provide an underground vibe in the Volta mode. Additionally, the use of the new DualSense controller's haptic feedback, as mentioned by Screen Rant, adds an extra layer of immersion by providing vibrations that match the pace of the player and even feeling the referee's whistle. The inclusion of familiar voices like Manolo Lama and Paco González, as mentioned by Vandal, also adds to the positive aspects of the sound design and commentary. However, there are also some negative opinions regarding the sound design and music of FIFA 21. Several critics, such as Nintenderos and GameStar, criticize the repetitive nature of the commentary, with Nintenderos specifically mentioning that it can be unrelated to the gameplay. The recycling of audio from previous seasons, as mentioned by 3DJuegos, is also seen as a negative aspect. IGN Italia highlights that while the stadium sounds enhance the experience, there is limited involvement of announcers, which can detract from the overall immersion. Hobby Consolas points out that while the commentary by Manolo Lama and Paco González feels natural, the contributions of Antoñito Ruiz and Nira Juanco feel incomplete and forced. Additionally, the lack of depth in the commentary is mentioned. Overall, the opinions of critics regarding the sound design and music of FIFA 21 are mixed. While there are positive aspects such as the immersive crowd noise, impressive soundtrack, and inclusion of well-known commentators, there are also negative aspects like repetitive commentary and the recycling of audio from previous seasons. The overall consensus seems to be that while there are improvements and notable features, there are still areas that could be improved upon to enhance the overall audio experience of the game.

In analyzing the opinions of multiple reviewers regarding the voice acting in FIFA 21, it is evident that there are both positive and negative aspects to consider. Xbox Tavern praises the voice acting of Kaka and Thierry Henry in the short story mode, highlighting their interesting performances. This positive feedback suggests that there are notable instances of strong voice acting within the game. However, there are also negative opinions expressed by other critics. COGconnected mentions shaky voice acting in the Volta mode, indicating that there may be inconsistencies or subpar performances in certain parts of the game. PlayStation LifeStyle goes further, describing the voice acting in the short form narrative experience of Volta mode as cringe-inducing. This suggests that there are instances where the voice acting fails to meet the desired quality, potentially impacting the overall immersion and enjoyment of the game. Another aspect that receives mixed opinions is the absence of legendary commentators Martin Tyler and Alan Smith, as mentioned by GameOver.gr. This absence is seen as a void for some players, indicating that the voice acting of the new commentators may not have lived up to the expectations set by the previous duo. On the other hand, Hobby Consolas mentions the commentary by Manolo Lama and Paco González but does not provide enough information to evaluate the voice acting. This lack of detailed analysis suggests that the voice acting may not have left a significant impression on the reviewer. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the voice acting in FIFA 21 has its strengths and weaknesses. While there are instances of interesting performances, such as those by Kaka and Thierry Henry, there are also criticisms of shaky voice acting and cringe-inducing moments in certain modes. The absence of beloved commentators further adds to the mixed reception. It is clear that the voice acting in FIFA 21 is a topic of debate among reviewers, with some finding it praiseworthy and others expressing disappointment.

In terms of technical performance, FIFA 21 received positive feedback from reviewers on multiple gaming platforms. On the Xbox Series X, Digital Spy praised the fast load times and seamless mode switching, while IGN mentioned goalkeeping issues but did not highlight any other technical performance concerns. On the PlayStation 5, Everyeye.it, Multiplayer.it, and Press Start Australia all praised the game for its fast loading times and smooth gameplay. Hobby Consolas and Vandal specifically mentioned the reduced loading times thanks to the SSDs in the new consoles, while Press Start Australia highlighted the benefits of the DualSense controller's adaptive triggers and haptic feedback. However, there were also some negative aspects mentioned by critics. On the Xbox One, GamingTrend and TheXboxHub reported various technical issues, such as abnormal ball behavior, inappropriate goalkeeper dives, and connectivity problems in online modes. On the PlayStation 4, DualShockers experienced server issues in FIFA Ultimate Team, with frequent disconnections, and GameSkinny mentioned issues with goalkeepers and defenders without providing a comprehensive analysis of the game's technical performance. New Game Network criticized FIFA 21 on the PS4 for lag, animation delay, and menu freezes. Overall, the consensus among critics is that FIFA 21 performs well on next-gen consoles, with reduced loading times, smooth gameplay, and improved graphics. The PlayStation 5 version, in particular, received praise for its near-instant load times, DualSense controller integration, and relative lack of glitches. However, there were some technical issues reported on the Xbox One and PlayStation 4, including goalkeeping problems, connectivity issues, and menu freezes. It is worth noting that some critics did not provide specific information about the technical performance or stability of the game, which could indicate a lack of significant issues or a lack of attention to these aspects in their reviews.

The opinions of the critics regarding the replay value of FIFA 21 are varied. Some critics, such as GamesRadar++ and Press Start Australia, mention the inclusion of extra content and improvements in game modes like VOLTA Football and FIFA Ultimate Team (FUT), which contribute to the game's replay value. They highlight the ability to play with friends and the customization options available. Additionally, critics like MGG Spain and Game Revolution emphasize the addictive nature of FUT and the depth and strategy in the Career Mode, which adds to the replayability. On the other hand, several critics express disappointment with the lack of innovation and significant changes in FIFA 21. JeuxActu and IGN criticize the game for not introducing new modes or features compared to previous iterations, which affects the replay value. They mention the absence of cross-play between current-gen and next-gen players, as well as the lack of shared progression for Seasons and Career modes, as factors that diminish the game's replayability. Twinfinite and Forbes also mention the frustration and reliance on microtransactions in FIFA 21's Ultimate Team mode, which can negatively impact the replay value for some players. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that FIFA 21 offers a wide range of game modes and content that can keep players engaged for a long time. The inclusion of extra activities in VOLTA Football, improvements in Career Mode, and the addictive nature of FUT are seen as positive aspects that contribute to the game's replay value. However, the lack of significant changes and innovation compared to previous iterations, as well as the reliance on microtransactions, are mentioned as drawbacks that may affect the overall replayability of the game. Critics like Guardian and GRYOnline.pl highlight the addictive nature of regular Ultimate Team events and the potential for multiple new manager adventures to keep players coming back. Ultimately, the replay value of FIFA 21 seems to depend on individual preferences and tolerance for the lack of innovation in certain areas.