Links

Amazon

Xbox

Twitch

CRITIK

Battlefield 4

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Battlefield 4
Item: Battlefield 4
Author: Critik Editorial Team

2013

GenresAdventure, Action, Third Person Perspective, Shooter, Military and Warfare, Single Player, Multiplayer, First Person Perspective

AvailableOct 19, 2013

PlatformPC, PlayStation 4, Xbox One

DeveloperEA DICE

Overview

Battlefield 4 is the genre-defining action blockbuster created by Dice, and made from moments that blur the line between game and glory, moments found only in Battlefield. Go to Boot Camp to learn the basics of Battlefield 4's engaging single player and intense multiplayer mode. Here you'll also find intel on Levolution, Commander Mode, Naval Warfare and many more exciting game features.

Elsewhere

7.7

Game analysis

Critik Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive (80-100)

Mixed (50-79)

61%

Negative (0-49)

39%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The opinions of the critics regarding the story of Battlefield 4 are quite divided. Some critics, like Game Revolution and Machinima, found improvements in the story mode, with a focus on a lone-wolf hero and personal experiences. They appreciated the graphical flair and light-hearted moments in the campaign. Additionally, Critical Hit praised the persistent scoring system in the single-player campaign. These positive aspects highlight the potential for an engaging and immersive storytelling experience. However, the majority of critics expressed disappointment with the story of Battlefield 4. Many criticized the campaign for its weak and underwhelming plot. Critics such as GameTrailers and AtomicGamer found the storyline to be vague, lacking coherence and explanation. They also highlighted issues with the writing, awkward dialogue, and a phoned-in villain. Gaming Age and Play UK criticized the campaign for being inconsequential, with a limp story and uninteresting characters. The campaign was described as forgettable, with a B-movie-level script and a lack of emotional connection to the characters by Game Informer. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the story of Battlefield 4 falls short of expectations. The campaign is often described as forgettable, confusing, and nonsensical. Critics like Hardcore Gamer and Impulsegamer found the plot to be shallow and unpolished, with bugs and glitches throughout. The disjointed plot, brainless enemy AI, and lackluster conclusion were also mentioned as negatives by Worth Playing. While some critics appreciated certain aspects like the graphical flair and personal moments, the general sentiment is that the story fails to deliver a compelling and cohesive narrative experience. It is worth noting that there are a few critics who found redeeming qualities in the story mode, but their opinions are overshadowed by the overall negative consensus. The criticisms regarding the weak plot, underdeveloped characters, and lack of emotional connection seem to be the main points of contention among the critics. Ultimately, the story of Battlefield 4 is deemed as disappointing and lacking in substance by the majority of reviewers.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Critics are divided on Battlefield 4's story. Some praise the lone-wolf hero focus and graphical flair, while others criticize the weak plot, awkward dialogue, and forgettable characters. Most agree the story falls short, with issues like shallow writing, brainless AI, and a lackluster conclusion. While a few found redeeming qualities, the overall consensus is disappointment and a lack of substance.

Gameplay Mechanics

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive (80-100)

81%

Mixed (50-79)

19%

Negative (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The opinions of the critics regarding the gameplay of Battlefield 4 are largely positive. Many critics praised the multiplayer component, with Gaming Age highlighting the impressive damage to the environment and physics provided by the Frostbite engine. GameTrailers also commended the multiplayer for its dynamic battlefields and changing conditions, while GamesRadar++ noted that the gameplay felt quicker and more aggressive without becoming a twitch shooter. Play UK praised the gameplay for its score attack mechanic and entertaining concept, while Push Square mentioned the exceptional multiplayer component with a wide array of weapons and gadgets. However, there were some negative opinions regarding the gameplay of Battlefield 4. Playstation Official Magazine UK criticized the lack of dynamics and clearly designed levels in the single-player gameplay. JeuxActu mentioned that the single-player campaign was scripted and filled with errors. Despite these criticisms, the majority of the critics still found the gameplay of Battlefield 4 to be very good. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the gameplay of Battlefield 4 is highly enjoyable and offers a great multiplayer experience. Armchair Empire praised the multiplayer experience as great, with enjoyable moments and the ability to level up and earn new gear. AtomicGamer described the multiplayer gameplay as outstanding, with a range of features including commanders, a Battlelog system, 64 players, destruction of buildings, and a solid unlock and gunplay system. The improvements and additions in gameplay, such as Levolution and increased squad size, were also highlighted positively by Critical Hit. The gameplay was described as chaotic, unpredictable, addictive, and better than ever by Hardcore Gamer. The tactical significance of water and the satisfaction of shepherding a team to victory were also mentioned as positives by Quarter to Three. The majority of the critics' opinions indicate that the gameplay of Battlefield 4 is highly regarded and provides an exceptional multiplayer experience.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Critics largely praise Battlefield 4's gameplay for its dynamic multiplayer battles, impressive damage physics, and diverse weaponry. While some criticize the lackluster single-player campaign, most agree that the game offers an enjoyable and chaotic multiplayer experience with engaging features like Levolution and squad gameplay. Overall, Battlefield 4's gameplay is considered highly enjoyable and better than ever by the majority of critics.

Graphics and Visual Design

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive (80-100)

85%

Mixed (50-79)

15%

Negative (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The opinions of the critics regarding the Graphics and Visual Design of Battlefield 4 are overwhelmingly positive. Many critics praised the game for its stunning visuals, smooth graphics, and impressive effects. Gaming Age commends the Next Gen versions of the game, stating that it looks "downright brilliant" at times, with impressive effects such as rain, shadows, and lighting. GamesRadar++ also highlights the smooth and beautiful graphics on the PS4 and PC, thanks to the locked 60 frames per second. Push Square mentions the exceptional graphical flair and incredible lighting on the PlayStation 4. Armchair Empire simply states that the game looks "very good," while AtomicGamer describes the visuals as great without over-filtering and praises the level design. However, there were some criticisms regarding the Graphics and Visual Design of Battlefield 4. GameTrailers mentions that while the environment destructibility and technical showcase are impressive, character animations can be awkward. Critical Hit also points out crashes and technical issues, despite praising the visuals as impressive. Gameplanet mentions that while the graphics are excellent, poor AI breaks immersion. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the Graphics and Visual Design of Battlefield 4 are very good. The majority of the critics were impressed by the game's visuals, with many praising the stunning graphics, realistic effects, and impressive level design. Critics such as Playstation Official Magazine UK, Game Revolution, and Game Informer all highlight the impressive visuals and graphical power of the game. Some critics, like GRYOnline.pl, even go as far as stating that Battlefield 4 sets new standards in graphics and features unmatched physics and destruction systems. Despite some minor criticisms, the overall sentiment is that the game's Graphics and Visual Design are a major strength and contribute to its immersive and visually appealing experience.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Critics rave about Battlefield 4's stunning graphics and visual design, praising its realistic effects and impressive level design. While some criticize awkward character animations and technical issues, the majority agree that the game sets new standards in graphics with unmatched physics and destruction systems, making it a visually immersive and appealing experience overall.

Music and Sound Design

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive (80-100)

58%

Mixed (50-79)

42%

Negative (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The opinions of the critics regarding the Sound Design and Music of Battlefield 4 are generally positive. Multiple critics praise the game's sound design, with XGN comparing it to a documentary or Band of Brothers, and GamingTrend stating that it has the top sound design in the business. The audio design is described as astounding, with buildings falling apart, towers toppling over, and distinct and rich sound effects like explosions and gunfire, as mentioned by Push Square and USgamer. The voice acting is also highlighted as exceptional, particularly the performance of Michael K. Williams as Irish, which adds weight to the script and immerses the player, according to GameTrailers and Edge Magazine. The visuals and solid voice acting are also commended by AtomicGamer. However, there are some negative aspects mentioned by a few critics. Armchair Empire points out bizarre sound issues and offensive language, which detract from the overall experience. GRYOnline.pl criticizes the poor Polish dubbing in the campaign, which affects the otherwise excellent sound design. JeuxActu mentions that while the music is pleasant, it doesn't add much to the experience. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that Battlefield 4 has exceptional sound design and immersive audio. The game's sound effects, particularly explosions and gunfire, are distinct and impactful, enhancing the gameplay experience. The voice acting, especially Michael K. Williams' performance, is praised for immersing the player and giving the script weight. The visuals and solid voice acting also contribute positively to the overall experience. However, there are some negative aspects, such as bizarre sound issues, offensive language, and poor Polish dubbing, which detract from the otherwise excellent sound design. Despite these negatives, the majority of critics agree that Battlefield 4's sound design and music are commendable, making the game extremely immersive and enjoyable.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Critics rave about Battlefield 4's top-notch sound design and music, comparing it to a documentary and praising its immersive quality. The game's explosive sound effects and exceptional voice acting, especially Michael K. Williams' performance, enhance the gameplay experience. However, some critics point out issues like offensive language and poor dubbing that detract from the overall excellence. Despite these flaws, Battlefield 4's audio elements make it an immersive and enjoyable gaming experience according to the majority of critics.

Voice Acting

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive (80-100)

25%

Mixed (50-79)

50%

Negative (0-49)

25%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The opinions of the critics regarding the voice acting in Battlefield 4 are quite varied. GameTrailers praises the voice acting as exceptional, specifically highlighting Michael K. Williams' performance as Irish. They believe that the voice acting immerses the player more than the story and scenario itself. GamesRadar++ also acknowledges the positive aspects of the voice acting, stating that the characters have more developed personalities and there are some memorable moments in the voice work. These positive comments suggest that there are notable performances and moments that enhance the overall experience of the game. However, not all critics share the same sentiment. Play UK criticizes the voice acting for wasting good actors on poorly written dialogue. This criticism suggests that while the actors may have talent, the quality of the writing does not allow them to fully showcase their abilities. Edge Magazine further supports this notion, stating that the script is not well-written. This negative feedback indicates that the voice acting may be hindered by subpar writing, which impacts the overall quality of the performances. Taking into account the opinions of all the critics, it can be concluded that the voice acting in Battlefield 4 has both positive and negative aspects. While GameTrailers and GamesRadar++ appreciate certain performances and moments, Play UK and Edge Magazine express disappointment in the writing and overall execution. GRYOnline.pl mentions that the voice acting in the campaign is weak, while Impulsegamer finds it sufficient to move the story forward. PC Gamer's opinion aligns more with the negative side, stating that while Michael K. Williams delivers a good performance, the voice acting as a whole is not particularly noteworthy. Overall, the consensus among the critics leans towards a mixed reception of the voice acting in Battlefield 4, with some positive elements but also notable criticisms.

TL;DR

voice acting

Battlefield 4's voice acting receives mixed reviews from critics. While some praise standout performances, like Michael K. Williams as Irish, others criticize the poorly written dialogue that hinders talented actors. Positive comments highlight immersive moments and developed personalities, but negative feedback points to subpar writing impacting overall quality. The consensus is a mix of praise and disappointment, with some finding the voice acting sufficient while others feel it falls short of expectations.

Technical Performance

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive (80-100)

25%

Mixed (50-79)

45%

Negative (0-49)

30%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

In terms of technical performance, the opinions of the critics varied depending on the gaming platform. Starting with the positives, the PlayStation 4 received praise from multiple critics. GameTrailers mentioned that the game runs smoothly on both PlayStation 4 and PC, with only minor discrepancies in shadows and textures. GamesRadar++ highlighted that the game stays slick and beautiful even during intense firefights and levolution moments. XGN specifically mentioned the technical improvements on the PlayStation 4, including smoother gameplay and no frame rate drops. Moving on to the negatives, the PC platform faced some technical issues. Armchair Empire described the game's launch as horrible, with server instability, crashes, and lock-ups. Critical Hit criticized the game for crashes and technical issues, although they expected them to be fixed soon. Edge Magazine mentioned severe problems with the game's netcode and server issues. GRYOnline.pl mentioned numerous bugs and glitches, including disappearing weapons and server issues. Quarter to Three criticized Battlefield 4 for its lack of technical stability, mentioning frequent crashes and server disconnections. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that Battlefield 4 had a mixed technical performance across different gaming platforms. While the PlayStation 4 received positive feedback for its smooth gameplay and visual quality, the PC platform faced several issues at launch, including server instability and crashes. However, it is worth noting that many critics mentioned that some of the technical issues have been patched or are being actively worked on by the developers. Despite the negatives, some critics, like GamingTrend and Hardcore Gamer, praised the multiplayer experience, emphasizing its explosive nature.

TL;DR

technical performance

PlayStation 4 received praise for smooth gameplay, while PC faced technical issues like crashes and server problems. Critics had mixed opinions on Battlefield 4's technical performance, with some highlighting improvements on PS4 and others criticizing PC launch troubles. Despite the negatives, multiplayer experience was praised by some critics.

Replay Value

Click for more details

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive (80-100)

72%

Mixed (50-79)

28%

Negative (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The opinions of the critics regarding the replay value of Battlefield 4 are overwhelmingly positive. Many critics praised the multiplayer mode for its extensive content and variety of gameplay options. Gaming Age commends the game for its impressive maps and deep customization, while GameTrailers highlights the inclusion of the Test Range and changing battlefield conditions as factors that add excitement and variety. Play UK emphasizes that the multiplayer is the main reason people will buy the game, with larger maps and variation in objectives. Push Square mentions the game's depth and unique features like 'Levolution', while Armchair Empire notes the abundance of upgrades and leveling up opportunities. AtomicGamer also mentions the range of features and unlock system as contributing to the game's replay value. Edge Magazine describes the multiplayer as having a unique rhythm and emergent carnage, while Game Informer praises the deep and varied progression system. Game Revolution and Gameplanet both mention the engaging gameplay and progression system as reasons to replay the game. GamingTrend highlights the new game modes, evolving maps, and improved small-scale battles as factors that contribute to the game's replay value. PC Gamer mentions the multiplayer maps and gameplay refinements as making Battlefield 4 a favorite current FPS with enough variety, depth, and quality to survive a year of intense play. USgamer also notes the lasting appeal of the game with new maps and content being added, as well as the inclusion of a Spectator Mode for eSports. While the majority of critics had positive opinions about the replay value of Battlefield 4, there were a few criticisms raised. Hardcore Gamer mentions that the single-player campaign is lackluster and disappointing, but still highly recommends the multiplayer. Impulsegamer points out that the unlock system is slow and better players have better weapons and equipment. However, these negative aspects were overshadowed by the positive feedback from the majority of critics. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that Battlefield 4 offers a high level of replay value. The game's multiplayer mode, with its extensive content, engaging gameplay, and deep progression system, was praised by numerous critics. The variety of game modes, large maps, destructible environments, and unique features like 'Levolution' and Commander mode were also highlighted as factors that contribute to the game's replayability. The positive opinions of the critics greatly outweighed the few negative aspects mentioned, solidifying the notion that Battlefield 4 provides a highly enjoyable and replayable experience for players.

TL;DR

replay value

Critics overwhelmingly praise Battlefield 4 for its high replay value in the multiplayer mode, citing extensive content, engaging gameplay, and unique features like 'Levolution'. Despite some criticisms about the lackluster single-player campaign and slow unlock system, the game's positives far outweigh the negatives. Overall, Battlefield 4 offers a deep and varied experience with lasting appeal, making it a favorite among FPS enthusiasts for its exciting gameplay and diverse progression system.

Overall Verdict

CRITIK

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Critik Score

Positive (80-100)

78%

Mixed (50-79)

20%

Negative (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

Based on the opinions of multiple videogame reviewers, the overall sentiment towards Battlefield 4 is a mix of positive and negative feedback. In terms of positives, the game's multiplayer mode is consistently praised for its impressive gameplay, graphics, and lasting appeal. Critics such as GameTrailers, Push Square, and Hardcore Gamer highlight the multiplayer as the standout feature of Battlefield 4, overshadowing any shortcomings in the single-player campaign. The multiplayer is described as a top-of-the-line experience, with next-gen visuals, large-scale battles, and innovative gameplay elements like Commander mode and Field Upgrades. Additionally, the game is commended for providing a fresh and fun alternative to the Call of Duty series, as noted by Play UK and AtomicGamer. On the other hand, the single-player campaign of Battlefield 4 receives mixed reviews. While some critics, like Gaming Age and GamesRadar++, find it disappointing, others, such as GameFront and Joystiq, consider it slightly better than its predecessor but still lacking in certain areas. The campaign is often described as forgettable, unnecessary, and tacked on, with a lack of checkpoints and technical issues hindering the overall experience. The technical performance issues are also a point of criticism, as mentioned by Playstation Official Magazine UK and Edge Magazine. The launch of the game is particularly highlighted as problematic, with Worth Playing expressing disappointment in the lack of a polished product upon release. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that Battlefield 4 excels in its multiplayer mode, offering a refined and innovative experience that sets a new standard for next-generation multiplayer. The game's graphics, gameplay, and lasting appeal in the multiplayer mode are consistently praised. However, the single-player campaign is generally seen as lackluster and forgettable, with technical issues and a lack of checkpoints affecting the overall enjoyment. Despite these criticisms, Battlefield 4 is still regarded as a solid choice for fans of the series, as its multiplayer mode compensates for any shortcomings in the single-player aspect. The game is seen as a worthy successor to the Battlefield franchise, with improvements that make it worth investing in, as noted by Game Informer and Game Revolution.

TL;DR

Critics have mixed feelings about Battlefield 4: Multiplayer is praised for its impressive gameplay and visuals, overshadowing the lackluster single-player campaign. The game offers innovative features like Commander mode and Field Upgrades, but suffers from technical issues and a disappointing launch. Overall, Battlefield 4 sets a new standard for multiplayer gaming, while its single-player mode falls short of expectations.

CRITIK

Reviews

99 reviews found

Machinima

Oct 28, 2013